| ARCHETYPE ID | openEHR-EHR-EVALUATION.review.v1 |
|---|---|
| Concept | Review |
| Description | Review of identified original material within the health record. |
| Use | Use to record a review of identified material within the health record, for example, that a speicalist has reviewed the test results and clinical interpretation of a test done by another clinician. |
| Purpose | To record a review of identified material within the health record. |
| References | |
| Copyright | © openEHR Foundation |
| Authors | Author name: Heather Leslie Organisation: Ocean Informatics Email: heather.leslie@oceaninformatics.com Date originally authored: 2013-03-26 |
| Other Details Language | Author name: Heather Leslie Organisation: Ocean Informatics Email: heather.leslie@oceaninformatics.com Date originally authored: 2013-03-26 |
| Other Details (Language Independent) |
|
| Keywords | review, opinion |
| Lifecycle | CommitteeDraft |
| Language used | en |
| Citeable Identifier | 1013.1.1508 |
| data | |
| Material | Material: Identification of the original material reviewed. For example: test results; or a second opinion of clinical findings in the record. |
| Inappropriate for Review | Inappropriate for Review: The material is not appropriate for review. Allowed values: {true} |
| Link to Material Reviewed | Link to Material Reviewed: The archetype path to the original material reviewed. |
| Opinion | Opinion: Narrative opnion of the clinical findings at review of the original material. |
| Details | Details: Additional structured details about the material reviewed. For example: examination findings observed from an original digital image. Include: All not explicitly excluded archetypes |
| Clinical Interpretation | Clinical Interpretation: Single word, phrase or brief description representing a summary of the examination findings. Coding with a terminology is preferred, if possible. |
| Comment | Comment: Additional narrative about the review of the material, not captured in other fields. For example, the reason why the material was inappropriate for review. |
| Other contributors | |
| Translators |